Ancient Rome Essay Example for Free

Ancient Rome EssayDuring the Han Empire of China and the roman letters Empire of the Mediterranean World were both had advanced engine room for their time. Han Chinas attitude toward manufacturing and promote was much positive than the Romans who had a more class divided society, therefore causing attitudes toward labor and engineering to be looked down upon. The Hans respect engineering and the tribe who mathematical function it. In China, 2nd vitamin C B. C. E. a political sympathies official stated that he wanted to organize their labor force with the use of technology so they could help to prevent a disaster from occurring when and if a flood takes place. This could help the tribe from acquiring hurt and their property from getting destroyed (Doc. 1). Huan Guan, a Han establishment official during the first century B. C. E. was touch about the lack of technology and poor governing body policy that is affecting the people. Haun Guan was trying to say to the Han gov ernment that using convict labor to make tools and monopoly on salt and iron is causing devastating affects towards the people and feels that the government can solve this problem by using the available technologies.Even though Haun Guan is a government official himself, he depicts interest in helping the people and is very critical towards the online government policies that are in place (Doc. 2). Huan Tan, a upper class Han philosopher during 20 C. E. is expressing his appreciation of the pass that technology has had since the emperors first invention . Huan Tan also expresses how technology has benefited the Chinese people and feels that technology is a gift from the enlightened emperors (Doc. 3).A Han government sponsored speaker, around 200 C. E. states how a Han governor, Tu Shih, cared late for the Chinese people and used the advanced technology to help benefit them. This government sponsored speaker emphasizes how ofttimes the inventions helped minimize the amount of h uman labor that the people did (Doc. 4). This is interesting because he was hired by the government to talk to people who might be losing faith in the Han Dynasty and he basically glorified the breeding way more than it actually was.On the other hand, the Romans felt that working with your hands was vulgar and seemed to intemperately look down upon technology and whoever used it. Cicero, an upper class Roman political leader from Italy during the initiatory century B. C. E. states that anyone who works with their hands are vulgar and looks greatly down upon craftsmen and hired workers. Cicero then goes on stating that gentlemen do non work with their hands. (Doc. 5) It seems that Cicero lacks a huge respect for inventions and inventors and feels like technology is indeed necessary, barely non for the enlightened minds.Plutarch, a Greek born roman citizen during the 1st century Roman Empire, expresses Gaius Gracchus highway building enterprises and continues to explain how the R oman upper class does appreciate technology that benefits the upper class (Doc. 6). Plutarch does show appreciation towards technology, precisely only because it benefits himself, as well as the rest of the upper class. He does not go on to mention how it helped the commoners in any way, because it most likely didnt help anyone but the upper class.Seneca, an upper class philosopher and advisor to Emperor Nero, from the 1st century Roman Empire, states that it takes someone mobile and sharp to make inventions but craftsmen dont have great minds. Seneca goes on to say that he does not believe that tools and crafts were invented by wise men (Doc. 7). Seneca lacks respect for craftsmen and is basically saying that they are not as smart as he is, and degrades their achievements and abilities that they have.He isnt concerned about any of the tools or inventions that are made by these craftsmen because he feels since he is an upperclassmen, he would never use them for the fact that they would be degrading to his specific class in society. Frontinus, a Roman general, governor of Britain, and weewee commissioner from the 1st century C. E. of the Roman Empire discusses how he praises the Roman aqueducts and their uses in Rome. He talks about how intelligent the designs are and how much it benefits the public (Doc. 8). It was quite interesting how highly was talking about the aqueducts.He talked about how unspeakable they were to the other Roman officials so they could see he was doing a good job as water commissioner, which is why he talked so highly of the aqueducts, because thats his job. A point of view that is missing from these documents that could only help to the discussion of the Han and Rome attitudes towards technology would be the commoners. All eight of these documents were of the point of view from government officials or other upperclassmen. It wouldve helped to see an argument made by the commoners from both empires because thats who the technology i s affecting-the commoners.Although the technology is also affecting the upperclassmen, it would have made a better argument to have someone who is more exposed to the technology in their everyday lives. The people of the Han Empire did have a more optimistic approach towards technology, while the Roman Empire looked at technology as a more interdict thing. The Hans took more into consideration of how it would benefit the commoners, unlike the Romans who didnt mention the commoners in any of their arguments. Although both Empires did use technology, some thought more highly of it than others.