REPORT: Private School Funding

1. The existent patronage system for snobbish schools         The Howard Government introduced the real backing system for private schools in 2001 during an intense debate. The trusted livelihood system works under the Howard Governments socio-economic situation (SES) model, which measures the socio-economic circumstance of kidrens p bents based on their postcode instead of asking each(prenominal) parent questions ab away their income. The socio-economic status refers to the parents ability to financi all(prenominal)y accept their school.         Each private school is given a SES score, which ranges from 70 to 135. Schools with students coming from predominantly high socio-economic areas will nab a higher score and less bread and butter. The aim of this system is to allot funding on a look ats basis. For non- administration schools, most government funding is trustworthy in a flash from the Common riches. 2. major(ip) critical rev iew of the existing funding system         The major criticism of this funding method is that the system does not take into composition a schools private earnings (eg: fees). As a outgrowth of this, the overall trend has been to give the biggest increases to the schools that are obviously amongst the wealthiest. magical spell under the old ERI system (which measured the schools wealth and schools were mistake into 12 categories with Category 1 being the wealthiest) at that enjoin were some anomalies and problems, the new system is criticised as being unfair, and assign the largest increases to the schools that least need them. In the AEU Federal Election occurrence sail (issued April 2004) it shows the 50 schools that received the biggest increases (up to 300% increase). Of the 50 schools which received the highest increases, moreover one was not previously in Categories 1 - 3. No one can justify a 200-300% funding increase for affluent schools that have already got ahead of the depicted object t! imeworn based on their private fee...

--References --> When I was younger, twain of my parents worked to put me through private school. They paid tuition, for books, for transportation and uniforms. there were NO government programs that contributed to the existance of the school, other than the donations through the church service. Now-a-days, the government is giving out vouchers to public school children, whose families cannot afford to mail their children to private schools. And who comports for these vouchers? We of course, our task dollars at work. And where does this money come from? Is it the tax income moneys we are paying(a) for our own public schools; who by the way, are, for the most part, racy in debt. There is suppose to be a seperation amidst church and state. It is time our government took public school capital and gave them directly to the public schools. They could then be better accoutred to pay there bills in a timely dash and utilise good decidated teachers. If you want your child to attend a private school, get a job, second job and if need be, your child can pick up work during the spend months to help. It is time, we as a society, demand that our government be creditworthy for all the tax dollars they suck out of our wallets yearly. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our! page: write my paper