Shannon Hess English 301 Professor Miliken Oct 15, 2001 Sweet Ophelia, or not? Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â I desperately tried to make myself write this report on Hamlets madness. I had planned to compare/contrast Hamlet and Ophelias noetic states to prove that Hamlet was not actu each(prenominal)y insane. In analyze about Ophelia and trying to understand why she went mad, I became more and more curious about Ophelias chastity. The idea that Hamlet and Ophelia had a knowledgeable relationship is lacking in hard evidence, but the slightest come-at-ableness makes it probable, doesnt it? Many of the interactions concerning Ophelia in the lay out would be easier to understand if, in fact, there was a familiar relationship. Does this mean that Hamlet was advance in generalizing all females as lustful harlots? Certainly not. Ophelia love Hamlet and she bankd that Hamlet loved her as well. Hamlet had promised to link up Ophelia and she trusted his word. A sexual relationship would have been unplowed quiet, but it would not have been unheard of. Without a sexual relationship, and with a perfect, good, chaste Ophelia, Hamlets attitude would be based all on what he saw as his mothers infidelity and betrayal. Is it possible that this one incident was enough to make Hamlet believe that all women are lying, weak, incestuous whores?
        Two lines in the play make it easy to assume that Hamlets treatment of Ophelia is because of his generalization of all women. The first appears in Act I, Scene II, Frailty, thy name is charr! (Shakespeare, line 146) Hamlet is reminiscing on the relationship of his mother and father. It is transparent that Hamlet feels betrayed by his mother. All of his life he has seen her pleasing his father and hanging on him as if increase of proclivity had grown/ By what it fed on, and then within a month she marries his fathers brother (Shakespeare, line145). The image he has of his mother is shattered. He feels that...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment