Media Essays Media Violence Society

Media Essays Media personnel SocietyMedia Violence SocietyMedia craze has been one of our biggest problems in our community. Violence comes from e very(prenominal) age, from a s obliger to an adult. Violence has increased every grade be take people do non understand how important our flavour is and do not take it sober. Media delirium occurs when people do not relieve oneself common sense and do not take responsibility. in that location are couple cases that count that media fierceness causes society wildness, and two against it. Most cases of media violence come from images, games, and the diverge people fork up on others, all of which produce shown well-nighone or something crucifying anything in its path. Those are some ideas ab step to the fore media violence without our society.There are two people whose lives were only about fantastic death it was as if it was in their nature. Stones close to controversial film, Natural Born Killers was mimicked by murder ers Ben Darras, and Sarah Edmondson. Darras and Edmondson ask killed over fifty two people and, in the course of their actions have become media celebrities. Both of them have a history in their life that is unfor deviltable. The public made this inconclusive accusation despite the affect last(prenominal) of both of the offenders. Oliver Stones said Ben and Sarah are deeply disturbed youths with histories of drug and/or alcohol hollo and psychiatric treatment. Bens alcoholic father divorced his mother twice, and then committed suicide. Sarah carried a petrol because she feared that Ben would attack her. Obviously, there were many factors inducing their criminal deportment further more complicated than equitable watching a movie and doing what you have just seen. many another(prenominal) cases like this one have been pointing fingers at movies for the actions of disturbed youths, doing so is a ridiculous attempt to nonplus a quick answer to an overly complicated matter.Mich ael Zimecki believes that ideas have consequences and that is why the ideas expressed in a movie have a contradict effect on society. To support his opinion he uses several examples of crimes that have been committed in the past and are similar to movie scenes. For example in 1993 a 9 year old missy was raped with a bottle at the beach by a group of new-mades, this incident was believed to be induced by the movie Born Innocent where a plunger was used to rape a victim. A boy from Pennsylvania died from imitating a movie called, The Program. He died in the center channel of a highway where he got ran over by a car. Michael Zimecki also uses a different greet to support his theory, he compares movies to pollution. He states a polluter should not be allowed to escape responsibility for his actions only if because environmentally induced footcers are late-developing. Violence too, can fester for years. Zimecki believes that societal violence is displayed excessively and needs to come to an end he asserts the hour has come at last, and the rough beast that the poet William pantryman warned about is already born.Some kids hypothesize that it is cool to do what happens in the movies, but sometimes what happens in the movies is not safe. Movies can change peoples behavior and personality. Violent movies promote the minds of untried kids who do not distinguish what they are doing, but they get hurt in the process of tipsiness their minds. Rated R movies that show killing and blood are the movies that kids are not suppose to see, but those kids that do are the ones that change because they think that it is cool to kill people, so they try it. Killing has lead to family separation, wage increase of violence with in the family, and in the society. That is what happens when these children try to do what they see without knowing if it is possible in echt life.Gregg Easterbrook has been working for the New Republic for the past four years and has written magaz ines of beliefs and values. Easterbrook states that movie and television set violence has a serious effect on childrens propensity to behave violently later in life. This theory has been question for years and it still is, but still many people have lay down connections between media violence and societal violence. At the age of 19 is when the mind of children has developed enough to know that violence is never the answer and that all kids are doing is hurting them selves. umpteen kids below the age of nineteen may think that is normal to act in a violent way and becoming juvenile prisoners. There are many movies that people have seen that show a very high standard of violent and blood like the movie Scream. This movie starts by a teen misfire watching her boyfriend getting punished. Thought out the whole movie students get hung, tortured and down to death. Movies like this can encourage children to do the same thing since they find what they see very amusing. Many people have died from others mimicking what they have seen in the movies and have been killed or direct to jail for a very long time and wont be coming out any soon.Maggie Cutler has seen media violence and has ideas of what has happened through out the years. Cutler said, Media violence is a risk factor that, working with others, can acerbate meritless behavior. She affirms with the idea of aggressive and brutal matters that have multiplied within the United States. Crime rates of juveniles have decreased about thirty percent in the United States. The media has been reducing the principles for accepting profanity. Further more, Cutler points out that given the overall juvenile crime count in 1997 the report implied, some 250 murders and 12,100 other violent crimes would not have been committed if it were not for the likes of Batman Beyond. She comments that on August of 1999 a Senator reported that television alone is responsible for 10 percent of youth violence. Cutler believes that this s ubject is too complex to psychoanalyse conclusively. There are some facts and ideas of what our nation has turned into with in the years.Scott Barbour strongly believes that media violence does not cause societal violence in teens. He supports his idea by stating that laboratory tests cannot be generalized to the accredited world. Barbour believes the teenagers results may be influenced by the adult researchers, he quotes Durkin associate of psychology Even quite early children are good at working out what adults want them to do, or will let them get away with. Another testing method he implies is invalid is correlation studies. Barbour suggests that the results cannot be taken into serious consideration because it could just as reasonably be argued that viewing violent television programs is caused by the childs preexisting tendency to be aggressive. He also quotes Jonathan Freedman psychology prof at The University of Toronto when comparing boys tendencies to girls tendencies i n relation to personality characteristics. Boys watch and play football more than girls do, and it is not because television influences them to, it is because of personality characteristics. Barbour believes that a childs violent personality is induced by bad parenting.Stuart Fischoff is a professor of psychology at California State University, Los Angeles. Fischoff has studied media violence and real-world violence and cannot find a connection between them. Nothing states that media violence causes societal violence. He believes that anyone who studies media violence can have a thought of what people may do in the real world it is not proved that everyone will do it. It is up to how people think, how they can take certain things, and if their common sense can change their life in a good way or ruin it by doing the wrong. Many people that are against media violence think that The plethoric effluence of screen violence, murder and mayhem is an uncontroversial menace to society. Tha t is what the opposing side has to say against what many people think about media violence.In Conclusion, media violence has taken place since the day we were born, but it has grown by the years mostly because of the messages sent out to the public. Movies reach people who do not know what their purpose in life is, so they go do the first thing they like or see. It starts off by imitating a movie people enjoy, then killing people who have done nothing to you. It can also be that you have an immature mind that has not grown into what would let you realize common sense. People have observed and realized that our humanity has been taken over by what most people would find most entertaining but deadly to perform at the same time. Some people may think that media violence is not connected to societal violence because they have the proof that we have. That is why people think media violence has been one of our biggest tribulations in the world. Works Cited OConnor, Tom Environmental Facto rs Contribute to insubstantial Crime and Violence. Juvenile Crime. Auriana Ojeda, Ed. Opposing Viewpoints Series. Greenhaven Press 2002.Cutler, Maggie Research on the Effects of Media Violence on Children Is Inconclusive. Is Media Violence a bother? James D. Torr, Ed. At Issue Series. Greenhaven Press 2002Fischoff, Stuart No link between media violence and youth violence has been established, Opposing viewpoints Media violence. Ed. Louis and Gerdes, San Diego Greenhaven press 2002Zimecki, Michael Violent Films cry a fire in Crowded Theaters. From Patters for college piece of writing (9th Ed.)Laurie Kiszner and Stephen Madell. Bedford/St. Martins Boston 2004. Page 612Stone, Oliver Memo to John Grisham Whats next -A movie made me do it? From Patterns for collegeWriting (9th Ed.) Laurie Kiszner and Stephen Madell. Bedford/St. Martins Boston 2004. Page 607Easterbrook, Gregg Media Violence Makes People More Violent. At Issue Is Media Violence aProblem? Ed. James D. Torr. San Diego Gr eenhaven Press, 2002