Animal Testing: Not Very Reliable or Safe for Human Safety

Animal Testing Nowadays there argon many companies that test their growths on animals such as makeup and paink liverishers. non many people pay attention to this fact, plainly in actuality they should. Excuses for companies victimisation animals for interrogatory atomic number 18 that they have similarities in their tissues and DNA. Though parts of the homosexual body vs. an animals body may have similarities but people must keep in mind that we are twain tot in ally different species. Science shows that animals rarely serve as faithful models for the human body so why would we feel safe with the product anyways.The best thing for us to do is test out products on other humans so then we can get honest and accur take results. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stated that 92% of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal testing fail in human trials from this information you can see that testing on animals isnt very reliable or safe for our safety and health. Also, it was utter in multiple science journals that testing on animals would be a waste of time and life, both human and animal. Testing on animals is stern for both species.Other than the lack of similarities between the two, animal testing could lead to the interruption of disease. For example, say my company is testing a new allergenic pill in chickens but it goes terribly wrong s d ills the animals, at present I must find a way to dispose of them and if its not done properly, and someone gets their yields on the one of the tried animals and tries to eat it theres a high possibility that the consumer pull up stakes become ill as well and end up spreading their illness to contact people, causing an outbreak. This could all be prevented if animal testing were to be banned. Thankfully, as of right now this has yet to happen, YET.Once again, we shouldnt test our products on animals because animals are baffled and have no say in the matter. With humans, we are able to joint our opinion and position on a subject so if we are Bering asked of something that we arent comfortable participating in, then we dont have to, on the other hand an animal cannot in any means voice their opinion to a human. If they dont wish to partake in these trials how would we have any way of conditioned? More on, if you are I keep forcing these animals to participate in these tests this will make the animal vicious and dangerous leading on to having to commit down the animal.If you keep abusing a species like this over time, you will be seen as a threat and that will be taught to the offspring, so in and so forth. If that were to happen we shouldnt even hope to get close to that animal anymore, they are traumatizing these species. Furthermore, animal testing is absolutely pointless because it is taking up but too much if the governments money. We, as a hole, ate already in debt to chins at 1. 16 trillion dollars, but we elect to continue paying just about 200billio n dollars in a each year basis to animal testing just fit cancer alone.