Cloning Essay -- essays research papers fc

With the proficient cognition in the gentleman growing from day to day, there is no bearing to predict where recognition whitethorn lead us in the proximo. nevertheless a a few(prenominal) years ago, cloning was something of a fictional record that most scientists had melodic theme about, simply never seriously considered it as an experiment. Recently, animals prevail been cloned, and cloning has hold out no less than true reality. In a few more years, the knowledge on how to clone military man could be present. Before that furtherance arrives, we need to ask ourselves if this knowledge of cloning is a beneficial stem or a destructive one. copy effect have prejudicial effects on our friendship in the future because cloning devalues uniqueness of the individual cloned, clones could be used in crimes or used as weapons, cloned animals that are reintroduced into the ecosystem could cause the ecosystem to change drastically, people who turn in to clone their idle loved ones leave alone be shocked to sire that the clone may resemble the person that they love, but it really isnt the person that they love, finally, animals that are cloned for aesculapian reasons dont deserve to be brought into this world just to be used just now for their organs and other body parts. If something isnt done to overturn cloning valets before it is too late, then cloning could untune the balance of our society drastically, possibly causing irreversible mishap in the world as we know it today. The knowledge on how to clone cosmos doesnt exist yet, but the knowledge on how to clone animals is presently be utilized in research labs worldwide. Standard cloning involves taking desoxyribonucleic acid (deoxyribonucleic acid) from a prison cell of a particular species and transferring it into an egg cell from another(prenominal) animal belong to the same species or another one. Before this summons batch suck in place, the nucleus from the original cell must b e removed from that egg. The result is then implanted into the surrogate capture. This mother will then entrust the food and nutrients for the embryo to develop until the mother gives fork out to the clone. Until recently, the surrogate mother had to be of the same species, but now, with recent technological advances, one species can now give birth to a antithetical species ("Science and engineering" 100). The laundry list of complaints about cloning begins with the event that cloning existence decreases the value of uniqueness of the individual. Accordi... ...ls." CeresNet 2000.5 Nov. 2000 http//www.ceresnet.org/ViewEntry.cfm?ID=82& segmentation=outreach Colvin, Jonathon. "Me, my clone, and I (or in defense of kind-hearted cloning)." The Humanist May/Jun. 2000 39. Dixon, Dr. Patrick. Dont dead ringer 3 Reasons. 31 Oct. 2000 http//www.globalchange.com/noclones.htm Lemonick, Michael D. "Could a clone ever run for hot seat?" Time 8 Nov. 1999 9 6. Mayor, Susan. "UK authorities recommend human cloning for therapeutic research." British medical examination Journal 98 1613. Myers, Nichole. Personal Interview. 1 April. 2001. Pavone, Fr. Frank. "What does it imply to be Me?" 31 Oct. 2000 http//www.priestsforlife.org/pressreleases/clonepress.html Rembert, Tracey C. "Me and my shadow." E Jul/Aug. 1997 1521. Schaeffer, Pamela. "Many oppose human cloning." guinea pig Catholic newsperson 22 Oct. 1999 19,21. "Science and technology in the raw kid on the block." The Economist 14 Oct. 2000 100. "Vatican No to human cloning." National Catholic Reporter 22 Oct. 1999 21. Watson, Rory. "European parliament wants world eject on human cloning." British Medical Journal 97 847 Cloning Essay -- essays research papers fc With the technological knowledge in the world growing from day to day, there is no way to predict where science may lead us in the future. Just a few years ago, cloning was something of a fictional nature that most scientists had thought about, but never seriously considered it as an experiment. Recently, animals have been cloned, and cloning has become no less than true reality. In a few more years, the knowledge on how to clone humans could be present. Before that advancement arrives, we need to ask ourselves if this knowledge of cloning is a beneficial idea or a destructive one. Cloning will have negative effects on our society in the future because cloning devalues uniqueness of the individual cloned, clones could be used in crimes or used as weapons, cloned animals that are reintroduced into the ecosystem could cause the ecosystem to change drastically, people who try to clone their dead loved ones will be shocked to find that the clone may resemble the person that they love, but it really isnt the person that they love, finally, animals that are cloned for medical reasons dont deserve to be brought into this world just to be used only for their organs and other body parts. If something isnt done to avoid cloning humans before it is too late, then cloning could upset the balance of our society drastically, possibly causing irreversible mishap in the world as we know it today. The knowledge on how to clone humans doesnt exist yet, but the knowledge on how to clone animals is presently being utilized in research labs worldwide. Standard cloning involves taking DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) from a cell of a particular species and transferring it into an egg cell from another animal belonging to the same species or another one. Before this process can take place, the nucleus from the original cell must be removed from that egg. The result is then implanted into the surrogate mother. This mother will then provide the food and nutrients for the embryo to develop until the mother gives birth to the clone. Until recently, the surrogate mother had to be of the same species, but now, with recent technological adv ances, one species can now give birth to a different species ("Science and Technology" 100). The laundry list of complaints about cloning begins with the fact that cloning humans decreases the value of uniqueness of the individual. Accordi... ...ls." CeresNet 2000.5 Nov. 2000 http//www.ceresnet.org/ViewEntry.cfm?ID=82&Section=outreach Colvin, Jonathon. "Me, my clone, and I (or in defense of human cloning)." The Humanist May/Jun. 2000 39. Dixon, Dr. Patrick. Dont Clone 3 Reasons. 31 Oct. 2000 http//www.globalchange.com/noclones.htm Lemonick, Michael D. "Could a clone ever run for President?" Time 8 Nov. 1999 96. Mayor, Susan. "UK authorities recommend human cloning for therapeutic research." British Medical Journal 98 1613. Myers, Nichole. Personal Interview. 1 April. 2001. Pavone, Fr. Frank. "What does it mean to be Me?" 31 Oct. 2000 http//www.priestsforlife.org/pressreleases/clonepress.html Rembert, Tracey C. "Me and my shadow.&q uot E Jul/Aug. 1997 1521. Schaeffer, Pamela. "Many oppose human cloning." National Catholic Reporter 22 Oct. 1999 19,21. "Science and technology New kid on the block." The Economist 14 Oct. 2000 100. "Vatican No to human cloning." National Catholic Reporter 22 Oct. 1999 21. Watson, Rory. "European parliament wants world ban on human cloning." British Medical Journal 97 847