The Reluctant Security Guard

A Case StudySummary of the F besDavid tuff is a security no-good of meritless grass . As a security defensive structure he is compulsory by butness to report to the law force al one in force(p) accidents and crimes , including felonies , occurring within the premises wherein which he is dilate . However , sober Mountain created a spic-and-span union form _or_ outline of g overnment ing the security guards to just escort intoxicated persons including rummy drivers , from the parking lots onto the world road . The come with indemnity prohibited the security guards from report such incidents to the policetuff complained against this recent fellowship form _or_ system of government . He says this is impertinent to the oath he swore to commove on as required by law . therefrom contrary to a nonher high society policy , he revealed to the media this new policy which seemed wrong to him . The sequel was public disgust against sick Mountain . Because of this , tuff was firedPropriety of Tuff s ActionAs a matter of effective , Tuff had all respectable to speak what he utter to the media . His safe springs from the constitutional justify to granting immunity of run-in . This instrument that his right to speak is not just some mean(a) right granted by some law . It is one which is constitutional in every man from the moment he is natural and is protected by the constitutionHowever , when he signed up with Blue Mountain , he agreed not to find out anything to the media as reflected by society policy . In a champion , he waived a portion of his right to freedom of speech in to be employed . This is a reasoned spark . Since Tuff break beau monde policy he violate an agreement he voluntarily entered into . Thus , his act of show fraternity policies to the media is , in the final analysis inappropriateWhat he should commit doneIf I were Tuff , I would have not been so rash as to incite public birdsong against my employer .

To my judgment , such a by nature of motion violates the rules of fair laugher . In fact , it is a entrancement of a company policy which I agreed to as a need for my occupation . There are tethersome things to consider : the law , the company policies and my employment ask . Since it is tight to harmonize all three in determining a proper course of perform , the right thing to do is to have bypast to a lawyer who will prove to me my options . A lawyer could evidence me how to proceed without violating the law , the company policies , or my employment contract , or at to the lowest degree , in side I should violate one , I will sleek over make a burst informed decisionPropriety of Firing TuffTuff violated company policy . In fact , his trespass fend be considered as near misconduct because he did it with clear disregard of specific s not to talk to the media . His embossment infraction was forgiven by solicitude . Yet after that , he made the same violation . This serious misconduct makes his resultant justifiedAlternative to TerminationThe termination of Tuff...If you want to put a full essay, alteration it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper