All prose is a kind of fiction. Referring closely to the way in which the writer of I, Rigoberta Menchu has presented her material, say whether you agree or disagree with this statement.

When we read a non-fiction maintain, it is easier to believe that what we?re reading is the truth. start-off of all, not many readers are that concerned about if what they?re reading is made up or not to hypothesise about it and second of all, it is simply easier to believe that what the writer is sexual congress us is the truth. In most cases the reader simply believes the writer. In many cases it is also too complicated to research the cultivation we are told in the book. But we are able to herald when something is suspicious. We have to, for example, include factor outs such as if the book had been translated. In the case of I, Rigoberta Menchu, the narrator, Menchu, told her story to Burgos-Debray, who recorded the conversation and later edit it. In the introduction, we are also told that Rigoberta Menchu?s narration (and she mentions it in the actual book herself) is ?a mixture of Spanish knowing in the political struggle replete with revolutionary foothold; and, most of all, Spanish which is heavily coloured by the lingual constructions of her native Quiche and full of the imagery of nature and community traditions.? Menchu herself says a few times that she finds speaking Spanish difficult. This also has to be taken into account.



It was hard for Menchu to express her story in a foreign language. After this the story was edited (we do not know what was left out, what added?) and after this translated. There is also the factor of how much we trust what Menchu tells us; after some deeper research, we capacity find out, that some actions described in the book neer took place?(it is said several times in the book that it is not a story of Menchu but her people.

If you want to channel a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper