Park Jane Austen

The wedding ceremonys of the three Ward sisters were totally mis sprouts of one kind or another. Fanny's mother married "to trouble her family," Lady Bertram proved worse than inadequate to the job of bringing up her children, and Mrs. Norris would catch been impossible no matter who she had married save she also actively works at corrupting the children of her sister's marri long time (2).

In the fascinating scenes at Portsmouth when a much fourth-year Fanny returns to visit her family the manner in which her p arnts are so perfectly suited to each other is clearly the reservoir of the damage they unwittingly do. Fanny is appalled by the reverberate and the indifference which could not prevail except that her parents only worry, or fail to worry, about all the same things. Mrs. Norris clearly should have been occupied in some way that would have unplowed her out of the way of her nieces. As a clergyman's wife she sure enough should have been much too busy to spend her age spoiling her sister's children. But it is Lady Bertram's nearly idiotic sloth and self-absorption that do the most damage, and nearly do much more, because, by virtue of her marriage, she has Mansfield Park in her hands.

Unlike other novels by Austen Mansfield Park does not end in promises of happy marriages for some(prenominal) people. Instead there is only

Bush, Douglas. Jane Austen. New York: Macmillan, 1975.

The other person who comes closest to possessing these virtues is Sir Thomas Bertram. nonetheless he, who is charged with the guardianship of Mansfield Park--the "symbol of a traditional, desirable, stability"--does not succeed in his duties toward the symbolic place (Bush 110). This is a debt instrument with many facets. In the novel Austen values the traditional, rural flavour in which the landed gentry are responsible for their possessions and their workers and corporation has a firm foundation in old, accepted ship canal of doing things. Fanny, although she is the daughter of a Portsmouth sailor, comes to be the strongest supporter of these values because they are the only ones that are fully congruent with the basics of unquestionable decorum.

But Sir Thomas fails to uphold them as even he believes he should. First, as Tanner mentions, the fact that Sir Thomas was a slave-owner who made money from his Antiguan plantations, "rather than his own land," promoter that there was "a jeopardyous split in his loyalties" (149). And the danger lies not only in the possibility of neglecting his English possessions precisely of neglecting the family and the small society in which he is expected to take the lead. The debacle of the theatrical production that takes place in his absence is, of course, symbolic of how things fall apart when no one who appreciates original decorum is in charge.

Tanner, Tony. Jane Austen. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1986.

But how did Fanny arrive at this point? The curious question that is raised by the intellection of Fanny-as-inheritor is, where did she acquire her own sense of decorum--the sense that acts as an unfailing guide to how everyone else should behave and to how they are failing. She was raised to nearly the age of ten by parents who had no sense of decorum at all. Then she was educated by the same teachers as maria and Julia--but without the spoiling they received from Mrs. Norris and others. She came in for the sa
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!