Inequality in Internet access potentially limits the ability of low-income individuals to find work, fall upon access to information, and reduces other potential benefits of the Internet like obtaining education o
1. sweep up measures to ensure equal access to the Internet for all citizens, plentiful or poor or young or aged;
As an institution, the internet is neither utopia nor dystopia, but a form of media that is malleable and more nuanced in its social touch, 1 that continues to channel as users adapt to it and as society defines it as an institution.
. The outgrowth of the unofficial campaign.
. More transparency and "gotcha" politics.
Jung (2008) maintains sociocultural factors significant impact "Internet connectedness" (p. 322). Many studies related to the internet and digital divide have focused on access and fourth dimension spent online measures to assess disparity. However, Jung (2008) contends that such measures are only one aspect of the digital divide. A second-level digital divide exists that goes beyond the access/time measures. Jung (2008) argues that even after people gain access to the internet, "the ways they incorporate the Internet into their everyday lives differ, and the differences gleam disparities in the multiple dimensions of the social context in which individuals are situated" (p. 322). Technological environments, social environments, and the nature of internet-related goals all impact the digital divide post-access, but when these environments are developed the divide is undermined among all socioeconomic groups in societies that exhibit these dimensions.
DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the internet. yearly Review of Sociology, 27, 307-336.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
No comments:
Post a Comment